FTC Extends Enforcement Deadline for Identity Theft Red Flags Rule Friday, Oct 30 2009 

For Release: 10/30/2009

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/10/redflags.shtm

FTC Extends Enforcement Deadline for Identity Theft Red Flags Rule

At the request of Members of Congress, the Federal Trade Commission is delaying enforcement of the “Red Flags” Rule until June 1, 2010, for financial institutions and creditors subject to enforcement by the FTC.

The Rule was promulgated under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, in which Congress directed the Commission and other agencies to develop regulations requiring “creditors” and “financial institutions” to address the risk of identity theft. The resulting Red Flags Rule requires all such entities that have “covered accounts” to develop and implement written identity theft prevention programs to help identify, detect, and respond to patterns, practices, or specific activities – known as “red flags” – that could indicate identity theft.

The Commission previously delayed the enforcement of the Rule for entities under its jurisdiction until November 1, 2009. The Commission staff has continued to provide guidance to entities within its jurisdiction, both through materials posted on the dedicated Red Flags Rule Web site (www.ftc.gov/redflagsrule), and in speeches and participation in seminars, conferences and other training events to numerous groups. The Commission also published a compliance guide for business, and created a template that enables low risk entities to create an identity theft program with an easy-to-use online form. FTC staff has published numerous general and industry-specific articles, released a video explaining the Rule, and continues to respond to inquiries from the public. To assist further with compliance, FTC staff has worked with a number of trade associations that have chosen to develop model policies or specialized guidance for their members.

On October 30, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the FTC may not apply the Red Flags Rule to attorneys. Today’s announcement that the Commission will delay enforcement of the Rule until June 1, 2010, does not affect the separate timeline of that proceeding and any possible appeals. Nor does it affect other federal agencies’ ongoing enforcement for financial institutions and creditors subject to their oversight.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,700 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2180

(Red Flags October 09)

Sorry I am behind Wednesday, Aug 5 2009 

I am sorry that I haven’t updated my blog in a month. I have been extremely busy with work and went on vacation. So, those who have taken vacation realize that you spend the two weeks prior to vacation trying to tie up loose ends and, possibly, even try to get a little ahead of yourself in hopes that things won’t be so bad while you are out and when you return. Then, you return from a one week vacation and it takes two weeks to catch up. It’s crazy!

Anyhow, we had a wonderful time on vacation in San Diego. The temperatures were awesome. The ocean was fun! Vacations go way too fast, don’t they!?!

Allow me an opportunity to catch up a little more and I will be back. I am trying to figure out what I want to blog about next.

Patient Notice for Preventive Medicine Visits and Office Visits Thursday, Jun 11 2009 

This is a notice that we have in every exam room explaining to patients how physicals and medical visits are coded and the expectant results by the insurance company.

ATTENTION PATIENTS:

If you are here for a scheduled preventive medicine visit (i.e. well-visit, Prev Med, or yearly physical exam) this visit will be submitted as a preventive exam to your insurance. Depending on your health plan’s policy, your insurance may or may not cover this visit. Not all insurance companies cover well visits; or, you may have a maximum annual cap for well benefits that is less than our charges.

If during the course of your preventive exam, the physician addresses and documents a problem-related issue (i.e. hypertension, depression, diabetes, pain, acne, etc.), you may also receive an office visit charge as well. In addition, your insurance may require you to pay two co-pays for today’s visit because of the well-visit and a problem-visit charge on the same day.

Some health plans have forced us to schedule the physical on a different day than the well-woman (annual female exam with pap), due to the fact that they will not pay for both on the same day. Please be assured that we understand that this is not convenient for our patients. We are sorry for the inconvenience.

Lastly, the physician assigns codes according to the services he/she provides. The doctor cannot alter the coding submitted to your insurance in order for your insurance carrier to make payment.

If you have any questions, please contact our billing department.

Rating physicians on websites Sunday, May 24 2009 

I’ve been troubled by the fact that patients can go to websites that allow them to rate their physicians and add comments. The main problem is that physicians can not defend themselves on these sites without breaching patient confidentiality. How is it fair for someone to provide a one-sided statement that usually is derogatory toward the physician or practice and we can not refute the claims by giving our side of the story. Who can make an informed decision based on one person’s claim of being treated poorly or unfairly?

There is always another side to the story! What is not being told is that the disgruntled patient may have wanted something that violated policy, the physician’s license, or the medical practice act. Perhaps the patient was abusive toward staff and was discharged? Maybe the patient just didn’t want to pay their bill and became upset that the practice sent him to collection? I can definitely say we have had our share of demanding patients who “want what they want when they want it”, otherwise known as the Burger King mentality. They do not want to go along with our rules and policies. They dont care that it was against the medical practice act to provide a prescription for something that the physician never treated them for.

I believe that anybody who looks at these rating websites really take it with a grain of salt. More often than not, satisfied people rarely go out of their way to find one of these sites and give their feedback. The patients who are fired up to get revenge are the ones that frequent these sites on a regular basis. Just think about how many patients a physician has and if you go to one of these rating websites and see 2 or 3 negative comments, is that really bad? Can you trust everything someone else tells you? What is their motive? Did that person have any part of the conflict? Have you ever met someone that was adamant that they were right about something and would not have an open mind to accept anything beyond what they believed?

Wall Street Journal article Saturday, May 23 2009 

I recently read this article in the Wall Street Journal. The intended audience are patients; however, I think that the comments are very informative to see the physician side of the equation. Yes…of course…I had to add my say and have commented on a variety of other people’s comments!

Why Patients May Be Billed for Free Exams
Coding-System Confusion Can Cause Insurers to Deny Coverage of Preventive Care

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124287021368941879.html

Wall Street Journal
HEALTHY CONSUMER
MAY 21, 2009
By ANNA WILDE MATHEWS

Thinking…. Thursday, May 7 2009 

I haven’t updated my blog lately…I am trying to think of what to post next and I have been trying to catch up with work and home stuff. I hope to add something this weekend. Please bear with me!

Thanks for your interest! Keep those comments coming in!!!!

Twitter = Love/Hate Relationship Sunday, Apr 19 2009 

I am having a Love/Hate relationship with Twitter. I think I really should be doing other things and get glued to what’s going on with my Tweeps. I feel that I have to always catch up from where I left off…I think it is becoming a sickness.

Then, I wonder about some of my Followers. First of all, I don’t want thousands of followers, no one will be giving me a medal because I have reached some sort of Follower milestone. I want Followers that think I have something valuable to offer.

In addition, I don’t want to follow “just anybody” because I probably really don’t care what these people have to say. What do we have in common? Are you in the same industry as I am, do we have the same hobbies, interests?

I think my Twitter follower number is getting out of hand. It’s probably time to do a little clean up and see who really wants to follow me for me. If they are the kind of Followers that unfollow when I unfollow, so be it.

Well, that is my musings of the morning.

Hello world! Saturday, Apr 18 2009 

Here’s my first try at blogging.  Let’s see where this goes.  Maybe it will go no where…crash and burn?  Not quite sure what I am doing yet.  I guess I will initially work on the appearance of the site and probably look at other blogs for ideas.  So there really is nothing going on right now.